Complain to the adviser or the seller
Whether the conditions, the capital risk and the term were explained fairly, and whether the product suited your circumstances.
07 Structured products
Structured products are sold on a headline — a defined return if certain things happen. The conditions attached to that headline are what determine whether you get your money back. Most complaints are not about the outcome; they are about whether anyone explained those conditions in a way you could understand at the time.
Short answer
A structured product complaint usually argues that the conditions attached to the return were not explained clearly, or that a product with capital at risk was sold to someone who could not accept that risk. Whether FSCS protection applies depends on what the product was and who issued it, which needs checking rather than assuming.
Indicators only. Not legal or financial advice. Not a prediction of outcome.
01 Is this you?
A claim is worth pursuing when the facts line up. These are the facts that matter most for this product. If three or more describe your situation, the checker is worth five minutes.
02 How it works
Every structured product has conditions: a barrier that must not be breached, observation dates on which the level is measured, and a rule for what happens if it is. Establish, from the key information document and the terms, exactly what has to be true for your capital and return to be paid. Then compare that with what you were told.
A structured product is normally a contract with an issuer. Whether you are protected if the issuer fails depends on the product and the issuer, and structured products vary widely. FSCS states plainly that some investment products are not protected at all, so check the position for the specific product rather than assuming.
Many structured products carry a risk rating that would exclude a cautious investor, which is why they appear so often in complaints involving savers who wanted capital security. If your recorded attitude to risk was cautious and the product was capital-at-risk, that is a specific, checkable point.
Fixed terms of five or six years are common. Where the money was needed earlier — for income, care, or a planned purchase — the mismatch between the term and the need is the complaint, and it does not depend on market movements at all.
Structured products reach investors through advisers, platforms and direct promotions. The route in matters: an advised sale has a recommendation to test, while a direct-to-investor promotion raises questions about the financial promotion itself. Both are governed by rules that apply regardless of the product’s own regulation.
03 The clock
04 The routes
Whether the conditions, the capital risk and the term were explained fairly, and whether the product suited your circumstances.
Free, and able to look at how the product was explained as well as whether it was suitable. This is where most structured product complaints end up.
Where the firm has failed. Whether the product itself was covered is a separate question and needs checking against the FSCS position for that product type.
Where the complaint is about how the issuer has operated the product, or about the valuation of an early exit. That is a contractual question rather than a mis-selling one.
05 Evidence
You do not need everything before you start. But a complaint that names dates, amounts and documents is much harder to answer with a template letter.
06 Questions
A level that the linked index or share price must stay above (or below) on specified dates for you to receive a return, or to get your capital back. It is the single feature most often misunderstood, and the one to check first.
A feature that ends the product early if the linked asset meets a condition on an observation date, returning your capital and a defined gain. It removes your exposure to further gains if the market keeps rising, which is a trade-off that must be explained.
Only if the documents say so, and even then it depends on who is doing the protecting. Many structured products are capital-at-risk, meaning you can lose some or all of what you invested. FSCS states that some investment products are not protected at all, so this needs checking rather than assuming.
Sometimes, at the issuer’s valuation rather than yours, which can be well below the amount invested. Whether that was explained at the point of sale is a legitimate complaint point, as is whether the terms and the exit mechanism were ever shown to you.
It depends on how it was structured and who issued it. Some structured products are regulated products and some are not, and the answer determines which routes are open. Ask the firm, in writing, to confirm what it sold you and how it was regulated.
Not automatically. A capital-at-risk product can mature at a loss and have been sold correctly. The question is whether you understood, before investing, that this was one of the possible outcomes.
Every rule, limit and deadline on this page comes from the official sources below. Each was read on the date shown. Where we could not verify a rule against the official text, we have left a visible instruction to confirm it rather than describing it from memory.
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Checked 12 October 2026 — Investment compensation limits per eligible person per firm, and what FSCS cannot cover.
FSCS compensation rules and eligibility
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Checked 12 October 2026 — The conditions that must all be met before FSCS can pay a claim.
Financial Conduct Authority
Checked 12 October 2026 — The complaint process, the eight-week final response and the six-month window to go to the Ombudsman.
Understanding compensation for financial loss
Financial Ombudsman Service
Checked 12 October 2026 — Award limits for cases referred to the Ombudsman, and how compensation and interest are worked out.
Financial Services Register / FCA Firm Checker
Financial Conduct Authority
Checked 12 October 2026 — The official register used to confirm whether a firm is authorised and what it is permitted to do.
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, section 138D — Actions for damages
legislation.gov.uk (The National Archives)
Checked 12 October 2026 — The statutory right of a private person to sue for loss caused by a firm’s breach of an FCA rule.
// Next step
Free, private, and no obligation. You get an indicator, the checks that fired, where you are against the deadlines, and the documents to gather.
Canonical: https://mis-sold-investments.com/structured-products-mis-selling/